Foundry Foundry
  • Book a demo
  • Products
    Pro subscription Business subscription Enterprise subscription
  • Resources
    Lawyer index Facts articles Prohibited List Rule Violations
  • News
  • About
    About us Who we are Our history What we do Our users
  • Contact
  • Login Sign up!
logo

Q&A with Founding Partner, Global Sports Advocates Paul J. Greene

September 06, 2021

A Q&A with Founding Partner, Global Sports Advocates Paul J. Greene. This is the first interview in a series of Q&A-interviews we will post on dopinglist.com and dopingwatch.com


Where do you work and what do you do there? 





I work out of my office based in Portland, Maine representing athletes who get involved in anti-doping matters.





How did you end up working in the field of anti-doping? 





I was fascinated by the World Anti-Doping Code and the burgeoning world of sports law in the early 2000s when it was developing and I was a young lawyer.  I began represented athletes in anti-doping matters and now three Code versions and nearly 15 years later, I am still representing athletes in such matters.





What have happened in the field of Anti-Doping since you started? 





The field has matured and developed tremendously since I first started to represent athletes.





In what way?





When I first started practicing, the CAS heard less than 200 doping appeals per year, now the CAS hears probably more than 5 times that per year now.  The first anti-doping Code was fairly rudimentary compared to the current 4th version. And there are far more robust testing measures in place (including the implementation of a whereabouts system which began about a decade ago) along with the biological and steroid passports.





What is the biggest change since you started working in this field? 





The pendulum has swung from trying to catch up with the cheaters to our present situation where innocent people who come in contact with a banned substance at low levels by way of environmental contamination are being unfairly (and unnecessarily) being caught up in the anti-doping web. 





In which direction do you want to see Anti-Doping go in the future? 





I would like to see anti-doping continue to take a sensible and equitable approach to cases involving low levels positives stemming from environmental contamination. The recently implemented thresholds are a good start, but more needs to be done.  Also, I would like to see substances of abuse removed from the banned list so that athletes are no longer sanctioned for taking marijuana, cocaine and other substances of abuse.





Who is winning the war on doping? And why? Are the doping hunters far behind the dopers? 





No, the doping hunters can now detect at parts per trillion and can test athletes 24 hours a day.  This is no longer the issue provided the testing system is not corrupt (like it was with the IWF for example)





Have you ever been disappointed by the harshness or the softness of a sanction for doping? If yes, in which case and why? 





I have been disappointed by the harshness of sanctions for doping many times.  I believe for one, first time whereabouts cases should carry a sanction of 0-6 months. These are cases where athletes are not even testing positive for a banned substance.





Do you feel enough is being done to protect clean athletes? 





Yes, in most cases. But sometimes clean athletes are being unfairly sanctioned for low level contamination.


Related articles

  • These athletes started their doping ban on November 5th
  • Q&A with Founding Partner, Global Sports Advocates Paul J. Greene
  • Cameroon International suspended for Furosemide
  • Australian Swimmer Suspended For Two Years
  • Italian MotoGP Rider Banned For Four Years
  • Coleman suspended for two years after three whereabouts failures
  • RUSADA Resigns Director General
  • Maksim Tikhomirov provisionally suspended
  • Russian Biathlete charged with an ADRV
  • IWF Acts Decisively to Restore Reputation
placeholder

Contact

Inside Sport AS

Main address:
Anton H. Mysens gate 13
NO-1850
Mysen, Norway

E-mail: iadb(at)dopinglist.com

Latest registered case

Khadzhimurat Akkaev, competing in the sport of Weightlifting, has been suspended after testing positive on the prohibited substance Violation of the Prohibition of Participation During Ineligibility. The athlete was handed a eight years suspension.

Khadzhimurat Akkaev is the first athlete we have registered in the Anti-Doping Database who has been suspended after testing positive for Violation of the Prohibition of Participation During Ineligibility this year.

Totally 38 athletes has been registered in the database suspended for Violation of the Prohibition of Participation During Ineligibility. Khadzhimurat Akkaev is also the 1269 athlete from Russian Federation to be added to our database after testing positive for a prohibited substance.

We have a total of 12059 cases in the database.

Handcrafted by Stephanie Hider © The Anti-Doping Database / Inside Sport AS 2005-2023
Website is being developed and technically maintained by Inside Creative AS

Login